![]() This was caused by an attack of the horde, so Jaina gets very angry about this and seeks revenge in destroying Garrosh's horde. With Mists of Pandaria, Theramore gets partly destroyed and Jaina barely survives the magic explosion of the focusing iris (thanks to Kalecgos, he saves her). In the end, i think it looks better.Comment by SentroA few spoilers ahead, so beware! But it really is not censorship under your own link.īut may come under a more general censorship usage. Or it could be as part of a general change to appeal to a audience. Weather you like it or not, blizzard can change it for there own choices. Now here is the thing, I would care more if this was not a constant thing thrown around all the time. Has it been said it was for china ? Is that a confirmed thing. ![]() Rather than bother with such a small change. Personly i would rather them change designs, to represent the future change in game. There are lots of design thoughts for changing the armor. She is a frost mage, so warm and cold enduring clothes may in fact be preferable as well as sea fairing clothes. Jaina was done ok, She has a neat design. Putting something under it is a good idea.Īs well as to much open chest, looks really stupid for Female armor. That is fairly easy, the older art looks like some form of fitted armor. You have yet to articulate why it is good. This could have been a moment where team 5 and actiblizz took a stand and said “NO!” and made a statement not just for women, but against the dangerous trend of censorship that has taken hold in the last several years…instead, they chose money over their principles. And just how many tech companies kowtow to it and the regime there just so they can make money (along with other not so great practices just to save money on labor costs). Anyone who does not know should look up what the “great firewall” is some time. Jaina is simply one of the latest in a long line of subject matter to fall to the repressive and draconian policies of that regime’s censorship practices. There’s a couple others, but clearly the first definition is the one that we’re talking about here. This is “real censorship.” In case anyone is confused:ġa : the institution, system, or practice of censoring They oppose government censorship.ī : the actions or practices of censors especially : censorial control exercised repressively censorship that has … permitted a very limited dispersion of facts - Philip Wylie If people want it, they can want it as well. I would not want them to change it back, But i would be fine with a choice. And i think in the end it does make it better. Its art direction change for what ever reason. But i disagree that this particular change is bad. Its good to criticize a change, its also very good to make sure your points stand and show you understand more than the most basic of what you are arguing for.Ĭonsidering how you talk about china, it seems you have a very political stance of your own. Its the same with other laws in different country’s that effect things like this all the time. Some of the same people who then turn around and use just that to justify the same thing.ĭifferent country’s, do see things a different way. Not over real censorship, just a company looking to do whats needed to make money. And then the Its Censorship crowd is up in arms. This is fine, until its something sexy that gets changed. Its Art direction that may have been influenced by the want to sell in a specific country. Rather than to appeal to some sense of fan service. Is that happening, probably not.Īnd i would prefer them to wear clothing that makes sense for the character in the situations they are depicted in. If its for china, there would probably be a lot of other things that need to be changed as well. Which probably comes from design limitations in Warcraft games. Rather than the very awkward chest piece. She still has a fair bit showing, but it looks like she has something under the armor now. But giving it a simple label is not only dishonest, but it also serves to undermine real censorship in the world. People can disagree with it, They can lay out reasons why its not as good as before. Its there art to change, And what this does is take away there opinions on why it should be changed. “You look better covered up, lest you offend some sensitive person…or a country that has one of the worst human rights records out there.”īut its not Censorship, if they want to change the art. This is the new direction that team 5 and actiblizz is supporting, a country with one of the worst human rights violations out there.Īgain, great message team 5 and actiblizz sends to women! ![]() From the same place that banned Winnie the Pooh of all characters. Its not even censorship, Its art direction change.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |